6.29.2005

Time to Move On

Barring any natural disasters from Mother nature or stupid mistakes on someone else's part (I'll explain the complete moving company/Navy paperwork debacle/disaster in a later post) I am fucking FINALLY leaving California and I'm headed to Big Sky country. Goodbye and good riddance, to quote AC/DC. There should be many stories from the road, as well as pictures from my new camera.

Because I've told myself that the day I leave the Navy I would play this song, I'll be playing Last Mornin' by Dr. Hook as I leave San Diego. And when I get to the Montana border, I'm going to play the best opening song EVER: 'Big Sky' by Reverend Horton Heat. Now just to get there.

But since this Tom Petty song has kind of been the one-song soundtrack that really stuck in my mind about leaving California since last year, here it is.

Morgan's alarm clock just went off...I'm outta here. Time to move on...time to get going.

Time To Move On
by Tom Petty

It's time to move on, time to get going
What lies ahead, I have no way of knowing
But under my feet, baby, grass is growing
It's time to move on, it's time to get going

Broken skyline, movin' through the airport
She's an honest defector
Conscientious objector
Now her own protector

Broken skyline, which way to love land
Which way to something better
Which way to forgiveness
Which way do I go

Time to move on, time to get going
What lies ahead, I have no way of knowing
But under my feet, baby, grass is growing
It's time to move on, it's time to get going

Sometime later, getting the words wrong
Wasting the meaning and losing the rhyme
Nauseous adrenaline
Like breakin' up a dogfight
Like a deer in the headlights
Frozen in real time
I'm losing my mind

It's time to move on, time to get going
What lies ahead, I have no way of knowing
But under my feet, baby, grass is growing
It's time to move on, it's time to get going

6.24.2005

A Complete Listing of my Bookmarks

Here is a complete, unchanged listing of my bookmarks. There is some pretty cool stuff hidden in my bookmarks, but I have a tendency to save things to look at later and I never get to them. So there might be stuff in here I haven't even read myself.

I was just going to post the whole page as a post here, but there is something about the way Safari formats it for exporting that Blogger doesn't format as well as it should normally look. A web standards conflict, I guess. That's why I linked to it instead of posting the complete list.

For the enquiring minds, yes, my porn [Pr0n] bookmarks are in there, too. (Funny side note...I found this ASCII Pr0n site while searching for a link to the word Pr0n.)

6.20.2005

Gambling’s Toll in Las Vegas, Nevada

This is my research paper from English 101 last semester. Out of all my papers, this was the only A. I put some thought into it, as well as some personal observations about Las Vegas. The paper just kind of wrote itself. I'm quite happy with it, as this paper managed to land me an A in the class despite all my other papers being B's and skipping almost all the class time devoted to this paper.

Gambling’s Toll in Las Vegas, Nevada

Las Vegas, Nevada is known worldwide for its reputation as a “city of sin”, a cultural mecca for gambling, entertainment, and neon attractions of all types. Anyone with a knack for gambling is sure to find it a paradise of vices with doors wide open 24 hours a day. But it was not always this way. Las Vegas started out as a small population that served as a convenient stopping point on the way to southern California on the Old Spanish Trail. From there, it grew because of the nearby Hoover Dam and military bases, which supplied a fair amount of business for the first casinos. Illegal gambling in southern California began to be scrutinized heavily by the law, so people started to travel to Nevada to get their gambling fix (Schlosser, 235). In 1931, when Nevada legalized gambling, organized crime saw to it that Las Vegas became what it is today, a culture built around pleasure and luxury (Moye). The majority of the growth in Las Vegas began in the late 1970s. Since the early 1980s, the population has almost tripled (Schlosser, 235). The current population statistics show that Las Vegas is the fastest growing metropolitan area in the United States with 6,000 people moving there monthly (Moye). Las Vegas is quite possibly one of the best examples of an almost exclusively service-oriented city. There isn’t a solid economic foundation on any natural resources or manufacturing, although the latter is slowly starting to become a reality. Ironically, the name Las Vegas means “fertile valleys” in Spanish, which was originally given to it because of the trees and salt grass, but most would not associate the two together when referring to the city now (Ventura, 97). Overall, most people consider Las Vegas a hotspot for the “new thing”, whatever that may be. It is a diverse city, constantly changing to the demands of the culture and the economy. Whatever someone might want, chances are good that they can find it somewhere in Las Vegas.
Prostitution is easily one of the most prevalent crimes in Las Vegas, and while it may be a victimless crime in most cases, it often brings other disreputable elements with it. While it stands to reason that gambling has little to with prostitution itself, the fact is that Las Vegas has built its reputation around a seamy edge that no other city can claim. Naturally, where people go to spend big money and occasionally win big money, there will be a sex racket somewhere close. The law strictly states that prostitution is not legal in Clark County, which covers all of Las Vegas, although it is legal in other counties in Nevada with a population of less than 400, 000 (Rocha). While that may be the case, there is evidence everywhere that it is not strictly followed. This is partially due to the influx of so many visitors that think that prostitution is legal because of the abundance of advertisements for sexual favors all over the city, even stacks of flyers outside the Sheriff’s office (Coronado, 6). In 1981, Las Vegas phone books had 30 pages of prostitution advertisements, but now it covers more than 120 pages under the guise of “entertainment purposes” (Sify.com). While this may not be concrete evidence that more prostitution is actually taking place, it certainly underlines its accessibility. That, coupled with the fact that there are now more than an estimated 38 million tourists that visit Las Vegas yearly (more than ever before), points to the fact that prostitution is up from what it used to be because of the sheer numbers of people visiting the city (Coronado, 6). Anyone who goes there for even a few hours will notice advertisements on taxis, stacks of flyers on the sidewalks, and anywhere they can be tacked up in plain view of passersby. On a positive note, a recent closure of the last hourly hotel in Las Vegas, the Del Mar, represents at least a step in the right direction towards battling prostitution (McCarthy). While the true numbers of prostitutes in Las Vegas at any given time can never be known, most police would agree that it appears to be up. Partially, this has to do with loopholes in the law. It is often hard to enforce prostitution laws because the law protects prostitutes under the First Amendment, which allows private dancing as freedom of speech and art forms (Sify.com). Obviously, this leads call girls to prostitution once they are inside the room with the man, but is hard to fight because the law is in favor of the prostitutes and the johns they do business with. Another problem that the Las Vegas police have targeted are child prostitutes who begin working at an early age, sometimes as early as 13 (McCarthy). Much of this has to do with Las Vegas’s well-known “guilt-free” attitude, as well as an inundation of young outsiders who try to make it big there because of its reputation (McCarthy). While in many cases not a lot can be done because the law favors the freedom of speech for criminals, the police are making an effort for a better Las Vegas.
Because of its natural attraction for big-time spenders, Las Vegas has always been a hotspot for organized crime, and crime in general. It was partially built on the foundation of the mob, where larger than life gangsters once ruled the city with their iron fist (Answers.com). Nowadays, most organized crime in Las Vegas has given way to the growing demands of capitalism and big business. Even mobsters can’t stop the inroads of entrepreneurial millionaires such as Steve Wynn who recently opened a “megaresort” in Las Vegas costing $2.7 billion (Coronado, 6). While it is hard to imagine Las Vegas without its original mob connections, it is easy to see why the influence has changed. Legitimate enterprise is trying to take shape, albeit slowly. But that doesn’t stop the illegal racketeering, drug trafficking, and prostitution from a new enemy in town, the Israeli mob. Two large syndicates from Israel, one based in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv are fighting over control of organized crime in Israel (German). Their influence has extended to America, particularly Las Vegas, for its potential in loan sharking, money laundering, illegal gambling, and prostitution. Because of the international influence of this particular crime group, its presence is in multiple locations across the globe. Police have only recently learned of such groups and are doing their best to control it, but because of the global significance, it is hard to combat.
As far as the overall crime rate in Las Vegas, it may not be as bad as it appears. In an annual report done by Morgan Quitno research, they ranked Las Vegas the 8th most dangerous city to live in, with Detroit being the most dangerous city to live in (Quitno). That is worse than 2004, in which Las Vegas ranked 12th. Overall, the state of Nevada has been the worst state to live in based on crime statistics for two years in a row. While some of the crime must be committed elsewhere, it is safe to assume that the majority of it is in Las Vegas, as the only other major metropolitan area in Nevada is Reno. On a positive note, even though the crime rate appears to be up, violent crime is down in Nevada. Some analysts believe that a portion of major crimes might go unreported by tourists because the majority of them have no desire to try to handle the aftermath of a crime outside of Las Vegas, as they will only be there a short time. This makes for an even greater error margin when trying to comprehend the real state of crime in Las Vegas. While it is hard to imagine how gambling could cause so many problems, it is an indirect relationship. Gambling is only the central focus. Everything else just seems to come with it. The volume of money that is brought to Las Vegas is enormous, because primarily people go there to spend money in a disposable manner. While the drinks may be free, the casinos are making millions of dollars from people who come from all over the world to win big by spending money that they can do without.
Because of the nature of gambling and the addictions that accompany it, there has been a wealth of social problems resulting from it, particularly in the Las Vegas area. In Las Vegas, all problems remotely related to gambling seem to be intensified exponentially because of its reputation as a place to strike it rich. Increased bankruptcies, suicides, child neglect, gambling addictions, divorce, and domestic violence are some of the common problems resulting from gambling. The state of Nevada ranks as the 35th state in population, but 4th in bankruptcies (Karouzos). University of California-San Diego sociologist Dr. David Phillips claims that Las Vegas has the highest level of suicides in America for both local residents and visitors (Karouzos). Recently, Nevada has decided to start addressing the problem by funding more treatment programs for gambling addiction. Nevada’s governor has proposed a $100, 000 yearly increase for the next two years for gambling addiction treatment programs (Friess). In March of 2005, Nevada officially acknowledged the National Problem Gambling Awareness Week for the first time (Freiss). In Las Vegas, there are 100 meetings a week for Gamblers Anonymous, which is considerably higher than any other region in the United States (Freiss). Funding for Gamblers Anonymous from the local governments seems like a step in the right direction, but surprisingly, some funding to help problem gamblers seek treatment is from the casinos (Freiss). Caesars Entertainment, which owns three resorts on the Las Vegas Strip has made it a mandatory policy that employees must report any customer that mentions that they might have a problem with gambling (Freiss). This promotes a positive corporate image and shows the public that the casinos are willing to help with the problem.
So the natural question is why does there appear to be more of a problem with gambling now than when gambling first took off? Technology could be the answer. Twenty years ago, the typical casino made 75% of its money off of table games, with a net profit of 5% (Schlosser, 236). Nowadays, slot machines bring in over 66% of the money, generally bringing in a profit of 20% (Schlosser, 236). With those kind of odds, it is not hard to imagine why people aren’t “winning big” like they used to. Slot machines, which account for the majority of the profits, are calculated to guarantee a certain percentage of money. There isn’t much left to chance with computers that are designed to bring in a certain profit, as there is with table games which generally offer better odds at winning. Overall, the effects of gambling and its influence on other parts of society in the Las Vegas area seem to be growing vaguely proportionate with the rise in population. But the government, as well as the casinos, are doing their best to remedy the situation.
Despite the social and economic problems that seem to plague Las Vegas due to gambling, there is no doubt that the gaming industry has brought money from all over the world to fuel an almost unprecedented economic upturn. The city has an estimated 6,000 people move there monthly, as well as an increase in property prices of 50% in 2004 (Moye). Some of the reason for this is because there is no state tax and the business taxes are considerably low. The economy seems to be growing, as Las Vegas and the surrounding areas have gained an estimated 30,000 jobs in 2003 and 37,000 in 2004 (Moye). Another odd dynamic to the situation is that 87% of the land in Nevada is owned by the Federal government. This has caused many investors to buy high-rises to expand upward instead of outward. 15 of the 19 largest hotel-casinos are located in Las Vegas, and they run at an average of 89% capacity annually. Much like the casinos, construction continues 24-hours-a-day all over the city. Many wonder what will happen when the population gets too big for the infrastructure. With such a massive increase in housing prices in a short amount of time, many who own property are certainly glad they invested when they did. But on the other side, many of the service industry workers who make the city what it is, could be doomed to pay highly outrageous housing costs, as the hope of finding affordable housing will diminish quickly. Centralizing a strong economic force in one area that has got little room for outward expansion often results in the unintended consequence of skyrocketing housing prices and too many people for the infrastructure to support, eventually leading to market saturation and a vast fleeing of the population to other regions.
All said, Las Vegas is a unique human experiment, as it is a completely man-made city in the middle of the desert that thrives on cheap thrills and the American dream of making a quick dollar with little effort. Even investors are trying to ride the coattails of the success of the gambling mega-city to get rich before the market is too full. To those who are scrutinizing the development in the past few years, Las Vegas seems like a place that is fast-forwarding the gap between the rich and the poor and has no plans of stopping. People go there with the knowledge that it is what it is, and those without a strong constitution can be swept into an illusion of false hope. The advent of gambling in new areas has caused alarming statistics in gambling addiction, bankruptcies, divorces, and child neglect, yet Las Vegas remains undeterred. If thousands of people go there yearly for a vacation and freely choose to put their hard earned wages on the line for a small chance at making it rich, why not? The keen will put them to good use. This is, after all, the land of the free.

Works Cited
Friess, Steven. “The Dark Side of Gambling.” Christian Science Monitor. 22 March 2005.
German, Jeff. Vegas Has New Crime Element: Israeli Mob. Las Vegas Sun. 30 April 2005.
Ken W. Karouzos. Harms of Legalized Gambling. The Çenter for Arizona Policy.
Las Vegas: Weather and Much More.
McCarthy, Alyson. Metro Targets Recruiters of Child Prostitutes.
Moye, Catherine. “Real Estate, The New Game in Town.” Financial Times, London. May 7, 2005: 12.
Quitno, Morgan. 11th Annual America’s Safest (and Most Dangerous Cities). and
Rocha, Guy Lewis. Legal Prostitution in Nevada.
 4 Aug. 1999.
Sex Trade Stains Image of Las Vegas at 100. Sify.com. 13 May 2005.
Schlosser, Eric. Fast Food Nation. New York: HarperCollins, 2002.
Ventura, Patricia. “Learning From Globalization-Era Las Vegas.” Southern Quarterly: Fall 2003 Volume 42, Issue 1, Page 97.
“Vegas is 100, But is it Worth Celebrating?” China Daily. 17 May 2005. Pg. 6.

6.13.2005

Ben Assfleck and Other Metrosexual Hollywood Fakes I Hate

Note: This was written back in December, but I'm just now publishing it. In light of what I wrote then, let me add that I attempted to watch The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou and it made me hate Owen Wilson even more than I already do. I got most of the way through it, but I just couldn't finish it...something about Wes Anderson movies...as much as I thought I would like them, I hated them.

Oh, and Ben Affleck put out another shitty film entitled Surviving Christmas which bombed.

On with the fun...

There seems to be a fairly close group of people who all kind of came around during the mid to late 90's or so. These people being:

The Good (these are people who can play main characters and command full attention of the screen. They have at least a running average of making more movies that don't suck than do, and they don't make me want to take a baseball bat to my TV when I see them. Some of them might even get nominated for an Academy Award.):
-Brad Pitt
-Johnny Depp
-Edward Norton
-Matt Damon
-Jude Law

The Mediocre: (These two have a good mix of half good/half bad movies. They will probably never be nominated for anything and will always be considered "Not great, but not bad.")
-Ben Stiller
-Ethan Hawke

The Bad and the Ugly (These little Hollywood bitchboys make me wish for nuclear holocaust):
-Leonardo DiCaprio
-Owen Wilson
-Ben Affleck
-Colin Farrell

I'm sure there are more in this group, perhaps some that even didn't make it, but for now, we'll focus on these people.

Brad Pitt - The quintessential actor of Hollywood. He's at the top of every woman's fantasy and amazingly, he's even a great actor. He's done many great movies and I didn't even have to search IMDB.com to remember them. How about: Fight Club, Kalifornia, Snatch, Spy Game, Se7en, Legends of the Fall, Interview with the Vampire, True Romance, and Meet Joe Black.

Johnny Depp and Jude Law - Both of these actors have really come around. Depp at least has some acting time under his belt, and Jude Law has at least done some obscure movies that I think are good.

Edward Norton - He did one of his best movies first, Primal Fear. An excellent debut. After that, he's done some of these movies, which I like: Red Dragon, Death to Smoochy, Fight Club, American History X, Rounders, The People vs. Larry Flynt, and of course, Primal Fear. All decent movies. Sure he's had some duds, but he's at least got some hope in his resume.

Matt Damon - Not a bad actor. Certainly, he deserves at least a spot in the top 5 in my list. He's done at least 4 good movies that I like, The Talented Mr. Ripley, Rounders, Saving Private Ryan, and Good Will Hunting. Unfortunately he's friends with Ben Affleck, which makes me suspicious of him.

Ben Stiller and Ethan Hawke - These two guys will probably never really make it big in a classical sense. They will always have bright spots here and there, but they will never get that one "big big big" movie that distinguishes them from the first list.

Now for the extremely overrated Hollywood idiots that I can't stand. I swear these momma's boys have no personal integrity and will do anything for a dollar. I can't even explain how they got to be in their present position of being called an actor. They are anything but. Seriously, I can't understand how these actors got to be where they are. Looking over their list of movies, one finds that when you add it all up, the amount of bad movies far outweighs any good movies they have done. Most of them don't even have one movie on IMDB.com where they were the lead actor and got over a 6.5. Also, none of these actors have any history in acting. They all just sort of came about in the 90's and then suddenly there they were. Basically what I'm saying is that even though they may get "big parts", the movies they are in are mediocre at best. Not one of these overpaid pricks have done a movie that they have been a principal character in that is thought-provoking or creative in any sense.

This is a tough list because honestly, I can't figure out which one sucks the least.

Ok, DiCaprio deserves the vanity award. He is by far the most "perfect" looking of them all. His only redeeming movie is Catch Me if you Can, but it still wasn't that great. Other than that, his list of movies isn't worth watching.

Owen Wilson is just annoying. He's not really that big of an actor, but he's like the Slick Eel of Hollywood because he keeps slipping into movies, but no one really understands how he got there. I just looked over his list of movies and he's played in a few movies with Ben Stiller, but for some reason, Stiller doesn't bother me like Wilson does. I think it's just that his acting just sucks. It's not that he's really a threat, he's just not a good actor and somehow weasels his way into some of the movies I watch.

Out of anyone on this list, these last two guys keep getting commercially big box office hits, but there's a problem: they all blow!

Colin Farrell - I'm thoroughly perplexed at how he still has a job in Hollywood. Farrell just magically appeared around the late 90's in a few obscure movies, then made a couple big ones. His only remotely decent movie is Minority Report. Farrell just makes me cringe.

But the actor that is like a shining beacon of shittiness above all the rest is Ben Affleck. Most of the time there is a filter called auditions that keeps people like Affleck from getting a big part. The thing I hate about Affleck so much is that people keep giving him a chance both on the set and in the theaters. Boycott this guy! A look at his Hollywood career proves that he's done virtually nothing good that he was the main star in. Easily the best movie he's been in was Good Will Hunting, followed by Chasing Amy, and Boiler Room. Those are the only good movies he has been in and probably will ever be in. His monumental bomb was Gigli, followed by Daredevil, Surviving Christmas, and a whole slew of other movies, none of which I've seen, by the way. A cursory glance on IMDB will make you realize that you want to steer clear of any movies that this guy is in. I'm pretty sure even he knows that he sucks.

I can also prove that Affleck sucks by pure mathematical equations. I added up the 20 movies that Affleck has been in in the past 12 years that he was at least a principal character in, and divided by the number of movies to get an average of a whopping 5.8! Ben, your track record isn't looking too good. Boycott this overpaid, overhyped, talentless piece of shit already.

Here's a funny story I found on a message board about him:

Affleck Rejects TV Cameo

Ben Affleck has turned down the chance to make a cameo appearance in Canadian TV show Degrassi: The Next Generation, despite director pal Kevin Smith's desperate attempts. Jersey Girl director Smith will fulfill a life-long ambition when he appears in three episodes of the show, a spin-off of his favourite childhood programme Degrassi: Junior High, which ran from 1986-1991. Smith has convinced Canadian singer Alanis Morissette - who starred in his 1999 film Dogma - to make a cameo appearance and hoped Affleck would join them. But the actor wants to stay out of the limelight following his split from Jennifer Lopez and a succession of movie flops. Smith explains, "Affleck, honestly, could use the work right now. What better way to reboot your career than starring in a Canadian melodrama? He was just like, 'You know what, dude? I'm a little too high profile right now. I'm trying to scale back.' He was just feeling the burn. It's been a bad *beep* year for him, and he keeps getting the s**t kicked out of him. I'm not gonna add to this dude's misery right now, where you know the episode would air and people would be like, 'Affleck winds up in Canadian teen soap opera.' And they'd somehow tie it into Jennifer Lopez."


I also don't like Brendan Fraser or Vin Diesel, but we won't get into that here. Brendan Fraser is just a nobody. Vin Diesel, he's just a terrible actor. His acting is about on par with your average porno star.

At any rate, NONE of these actors except maybe Pitt and Depp are close to being timeless actors, such as these guys:
-Robert DeNiro
-Kevin Spacey
-Al Pacino
-George Clooney

Also, I think Christian Bale is a great actor.

Updated: Accidentally Jumping Off a Bridge

Holy shit, this is an odd story that happened in Missouri. The Missouri is not a small river. The thought of jumping into it from a bridge on accident is bad enough, even worse that it was at night.

Rescue crews are searching the Missouri River Monday morning for a missing man.

Two men were driving on the Discovery Bridge when their car broke down around midnight. The driver got out of his car and hopped over the median, thinking it was blacktop. There was nothing there and he plunged into the river.

It's believed the other man saw what happened and jumped in after him.

The driver was able to swim to shore. Search teams have not found his friend.

Updated:
Authorities believe an optical illusion may be to blame for a Sunday night incident, where two men fell from the Discovery Bridge into the river below. The bridge is located just west of St. Louis Mills Mall on Highway 370.

Police say 21-year old Justin Winter and a friend stopped on the bridge to look at the water below. The two apparently tried to jump cross the median, but fell 60 feet into the river. Winter survived. His companion apparently got swept away. Searchers still haven't found him.

There's a 15 to 20 foot gap between the two sides of the bridge. But at night, from a certain angle, authorities say it doesn't look that way. Bridgeton Police Chief Walt Mutert says, "At night time it looks as if there might be something there. But as it turns out there's nothing but space between those two bridges."

Authorities say it has happened three times in the last month, too many times to be coincidence. So the Missouri Department of Transportation is taking action. MoDOT Spokesperson Chris Sutton says, "We're going to go in there and we're going to install solar lighting. The contract was just awarded to a contractor on Friday."

The lights will be fixed along the underside of both bridges. The hope is that they'll highlight the gap between the spans and fix the optical illusion. Sutton says, "We're certainly very concerned because it has happened more than one time, that we can go in there with a very low cost solution to add some of that lighting to hopefully prevent this from happening again."

It will cost $45-thousand to install the solar powered lights. Crews plan to start work on them later this summer.

6.08.2005

I'm Back

To this website, that is. I have been out of college for almost two weeks now and I am finally getting some free time without the hassle of worrying about tests, quizzes, and homework. I got an A in English and a B in Math.

So I should be on this website posting a lot more things. Especially this rocky transition to the civilian world. Fun.

Updated: Mini Review of Mac OSX Tiger

I've been running Tiger since April 27th, but I never really got around to pointing out some things about it that I love.

-Spotlight is revolutionary. Being able to find anything on my hard drive in about 5 seconds is nice. While I don't use it that often, I do use it more than I probably realize. It sure as hell makes the old way of searching seem like something from eons ago.

-Dashboard is nice. I've got a few ideas for widgets, but they are just minor things. I love Dashboard because it combines a bunch of mini-applications together that you can access with a button on the keyboard. Having up-to-the-minute information on traffic, stocks, news, weather, etc, at the touch of a button is nice. It's fairly unobtrusive, as well. I use the calculator a lot, so it's nice to have that at the ready when I need it, too. Once they start coming out with some really great widgets, this thing is really going to take off.

Some other minor things I love:
-The built in dictionary in Safari. I LOVE this feature. Anytime I am reading anything on the web, I just mouse over a word and push CTRL-CMD-D and I have the meaning right at my fingertips. I use this feature all the time. Here is a photo of it in action:


-Emailing links to webpages is now as simple as clicking CMD-Shift-I.

-While not exclusive to Tiger, I have to admit, the system-wide spell check is great. That means anywhere I type on my computer, spell check is always on. Awesome.

There are tons of things I am missing, but this is really what I like about it so far. I won't say that it is a completely necessary upgrade, but it sure has changed some things under the hood. I don't think it is such a major upgrade as Panther was (or so I heard), but it is a great upgrade.

It sure makes using a Dell at work with Microsoft 2000 seem like I'm using an old typewriter.

Update:

-Porn...ahem, Private Browsing in Safari is nice.

-I haven't had much use for the RSS portion of Safari, as there are completely different standards by which websites update their RSS feeds. Some of them have tiny snippets of new stories, some of them have half of the story, and almost none of them have all of the story. Which means you have to visit the site to read the story anyway. I think the majority of this is based around advertisements. If people don't visit their sites, the advertisements generate no revenue. This usually means that the sites don't put full stories in their RSS feeds, defeating the whole purpose of RSS feeds: not going to the site to view the news.

-The system overall seems to be running faster.

-The only problem I had after the install was with Mail 2.0. I don't know what the deal was, but trying to import my mail was a hassle, and now I've got a small glitch where if I'm typing an email and switch focus to another window, the Mail icon bounces in the dock and my message says, "Mail cannot save this message right now" which is annoying as hell.

-iCal and Address book weren't really updated that much. There were a few tweaks...but what I don't understand is why the hell isn't there a contextual menu item in Address Book to export vCards to a mail message? No, I have to save it to my desktop, then add it to an email? WTF? Why would I save a vCard to my desktop? It is already in my Address Book! This seems like a gross oversight to me, something that needs to be fixed, pronto. I just sent Apple some feedback on this.

Rave: Nyko Universal iPod Car Mount

This Nyko iPod car mount is by far the coolest thing I've seen for a (mostly) universal solution to the iPod car mount issue. Looking it up for this post, I found it at Wal-Mart for $16.72. A pretty decent price for what it is.

The only problem I have found is:

1. The mount covers my main AC vent. Duh, it's a vent mount. People were complaining about this on iPodlounge, but what the hell, it is what it is. My other options were using a semi-permanent sticker/velcro mount, permanent screw mounts, and some goofy cupholder mount. All of which look like shit or damage your interior.

2. I wish it was more of a dock mount. By that, I mean that I wish I didn't have to plug in the Belkin auto charger into the bottom of it every time I put it in the mount. I wish I could just plug in the iPod and go.

Other than that, it's a near perfect product. When you put the iPod in, you push it back on this felt pad, then click the two side-arms together to hold it in place. Then you plug the jack in the bottom or top, whichever suits your needs. To release it, just click the button on top, and it sort of ejects the iPod forward for easy removal. Great product.

Here's some photos that I tried to post to iPodlounge forums, but it wouldn't let me.









Might I also recommend the Belkin iPod auto charger?

6.07.2005

Rave: the Apple Genius Bar

Or, the generic term in the computer industry: the service desk for all Apple products.

As much as we hated to do it, we had to take Morgan's iPod to Apple for repair because it wasn't working with anything: the iPod software updater, Disk Warrior, or Disk Utility. I consulted the Apple discussion boards with little luck. All signs pointed to Apple repair.

So in we went. We found out that you had to sign in on one of the computers to get a spot in line at the 'Genius Bar' [Link to QTVR]. While we thought it was rude that we were standing there for at least 5 minutes without anyone asking us if we needed help, then to be booted out of the way for some guy carrying an eMac into let him sign in before us...well, it put us off slightly, as the guy didn't even ask us if we were waiting for anything. And, he didn't let us in ahead of the guy, even though we had been there for a while already.

Anyway, we sign in on this eMac terminal, and it shows us when our scheduled appointment is. Then, you wait. Usually, they can get to you in 30-45 minutes. Once your name is called, you go up to the bar and explain your problem. Then the guy fixes your bug in about two minutes or it's going in for repair. For iPods, it's a black and white issue. Either your shit is dead or it's a fairly easy fix. If it's an laptop or desktop, it's probably about the same, but a little longer. The hard part is the paperwork, only because it takes a while. Our problem took the guy about three minutes to figure out that we needed a new iPod replacement, as I had already taken all steps to get it fixed on my own. Luckily, they give out new ones.

The only bad part is we had to wait over a 3 day weekend, then they called us on Wednesday to come pick up the new one. We signed in, waited about 45 minutes, then did a little paperwork and off we went with a new iPod.

All in all, it wasn't a bad deal. I think Apple is being pretty fair with their iPod issues. I don't think many people can complain about their fairly liberal policies with getting repairs or replacements.

As far as the idea of the Genius Bar...well, I think it's genius. How many other computer companies have a fairly simple sign-in process to see a service person in less than an hour? Or people on hand just to give one-on-one training? I think it's a great idea, much better than Best Buy or Circuit City could ever come up with, as all they are concerned with is the bottom line. They could care less about customer knowledge or any real help for it's customers. The more confused you are, the better.

My only complaint about the Genius Bar is maybe they could have one person doing simple tasks, such as paperwork. When we went back to pick up the iPod, it only took a couple minutes to do the paperwork and go, yet we had to wait for a while. Maybe this is more of a systematic problem than anything. I've just always found that it helps when you sign in anywhere, if you have a simple problem there should be someone there to take care of it quickly instead of waiting in line with other people who have more in-depth problems.

6.05.2005

Another Car on Fire

Here's a photo that I caught of the aftermath of a car that caught fire on the 5 south, somewhere between San Clemente and Oceanside, CA.



A while back, I caught a photo of a car actually still on fire. I was two lanes over from the car, and I could feel intense heat on my face as I tried to steer and take this photo:

6.03.2005

Best Buy Sucks

Best Buy Sucks is a great way to see how Best Buy fucks over their customers on a daily basis.

A quick scan over the recent complaints towards Best Buy reveals the following:

-A bloodthirsty staff on commission hellbent on selling you accessories and extended warranties instead of being truly knowledgable about their products. [I witnessed this first hand last weekend, and many times prior. I explained to the guy I didn't need anything else and he still kept bothering me about it.]
-A magazine scam when you are checking out where they take your credit card number to sign you up for a "free trial" of some magazine. If you don't cancel it, they charge you for the magazines without any real notice, other than the fine print. Beware of this scam.
-Their return policy is horrible. Digital cameras, camcorders and laptops all get a 15% restocking fee if returned open within 14 days. Bullshit. A 5% restocking fee wouldn't be that bad, but come on.
-Completely crappy staff at Best Buy.

I bought my first computer at Best Buy and let me tell you what a hassle that was. I had $2500 burning a hole in my pocket walking in the store. I had done my homework about the computer I wanted, and I had already checked with a sales associate on the phone to see if they had it in stock. They did. So I go in the store and tell the computer guy what I wanted and I hand him the sheet I had printed out, also explaining that I knew they had it in stock. They hate when you've done your homework. He starts giving me the runaround about the extended warranty, accessories, games, software, the whole shebang. I politely ignored him and told him that I would like to hold the computer, as I was going to go look around for some accessories of my own. I shop around, come back with a cart full of blank CD's, a game or two, a mouse, and a mousepad. So, after asking ol' boy where my computer was, he takes a long look into my cart, checking his own internal corporate bullshit spiel against my cart inventory. Again, he bugs me about accessories, and still my computer is up in a cage high above everything else where it hasn't been touched yet. So after this guy helps someone else, he goes up to get my computer. Finally! Then he turns me over to another sales associate who pushes the extended warranty (kindly declining, again) as well as the registration of the computer, which took forever. Finally, I am out of there, but not without grief. I was so aggravated by the time I got done, I vowed never to buy a computer there again. And, I haven't.

Morgan went to buy an iPod mount for her car. She had done her research online, found the mount she wanted, and headed down to Best Buy. After looking around for a minute or two, she asked the lady if they had the product she wanted. She said she hadn't heard of it. Morgan told her that she seen it on the website and said they had it in stock. The girl told her curtly and rudely that the inventory didn't always match the website, and left it at that. Undeterred by yet another rude Best Buy employee, she found it on her own - the last one in stock. She went back to tell the girl, who basically said, "That's nice," and went back to what she was doing.

From my relatively few jaunts to BB, I can honestly say that I have never had a good experience there. I don't plan to ever have a good experience there, and I won't be shopping there in the future unless absolutely necessary. ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.